.

Postcards
from Scotland

We asked a selection of SR
contributors for a memory
of an outstanding holiday in
Scotland – good or bad



Marian Pallister in Tobermory
George Chalmers in Ayr
Islay McLeod in Rockcliffe
Judith Jaafar in Carrick Castle
Barney MacFarlane on Arran



Bill Jamieson on Bute
Tessa Ransford in North Berwick
Michael Elcock on Harris
Ronnie Smith in Largs

Katie Grant on Mull
Thom Cross in Kirkcaldy
Morelle Smith in Glencoe
Bob Cant in Carnoustie

Robin Downie on Arran
Bruce Gardner in Glen Livet
Fiona MacDonald on Tiree
Walter Humes at home

Jill Stephenson at Loch Duich
Quintin Jardine in Elie
Iain Macmillan in Gleneagles
Douglas Marr on Skye
Andrew McFadyen in Kilmarnock

R D Kernohan on Arran
David Torrance on Iona
Catherine Czerkawska at Loch Ken
Chris Holligan in Elie

Rose Galt in Girvan
Alex Wood on Arran
Andrew Hook in Glasgow
Alasdair McKillop in St Andrews

Sheila Hetherington on Arran
Anthony Seaton on Ben Nevis
Paul Cockburn at Loch Ness
Jackie Kemp in a taxi
Angus Skinner on Skye

14.12.11
No. 492

rThe Cafe

One can only assume that part of the remit of contributors to SR is to stimulate debate. In this aim, John Cameron is one of the more successful participants. I would agree that in a democratic society it is important that we debate issues such as local pay bargaining but he spoiled a worthy motive by veering into the overtaking lane and resorting to stereotypical union bashing.
     The main thrust of his contribution (8 December) is that public service workers at the lower end of the scale actually seem to be expecting a decent wage, resulting in over 50% of all spending being directly linked to reward for labour. How dare they?
     Mr Cameron recognises the weakness, through legislation, of modern union representation at a time when banks and speculators have brought our economy to its knees. He then deduces that this weakness is an opportunity to further weaken what little protection the poor may have from breadline wages and an impoverished retirement – if they reach it.
     What is his desired endgame? A constant churning of public servants from one low-paid job to another without the opportunity to generate any reasonable lifestyle nor a nest egg to keep oneself and one's family out of a benefits system in retirement? Dare one call this a service and reward economy befitting a modern democracy or is it only bankers who may be allowed a bonus, no matter how poorly earned?
     Some of us aspire for better things for Scotland.

Paul Cochrane

I believe the entire Milly Dowler story was initially played up by the BBC because they were scared Murdoch was going to take away their media monopoly, through growing Sky.
     However the general refusal of the press to be seen to stand up for freedom shows what they are. Kenneth Roy's article (13 December) is a formidable exception and unsurprisingly is online rather than on paper.

Neil Craig

Today's banner

Leith
Photograph by
Islay McLeod




Scotland has just set

back the cause of penal

reform by 100 years

 

David Mackenzie

 

The wall at Saughton prison
Photograph by islay McLeod

 

All prisons are naturally oubliettes – forgotten places. We pass them in the car and on the bus and unless we are directly connected to the individual inmates, the staff or the others who are involved, it is likely that we don't give them much of a thought. At the back of our minds we might be a little guilty about our ignorance but we settle with the thought that the powers that be will know what they are doing. 
     This apathy I have shared. It was only when some friends became inmates at my local jail that I began to learn about the prison world. Then other friends became members of a statutory prison visiting committee, acting on behalf of the justice minister and appointed by the local authority. Their work seems to have two distinct but practically interwoven aspects. They are required to respond promptly to approaches from prisoners with problems and complaints and support them in managing these. They also have a statutory responsibility to monitor the condition of the prison and its management on a fortnightly basis, asking the important questions and feeding back to both prison management and their local visiting committee.
     In undertaking this task they have the right to visit any part of the prison at any time. Though the visitor system is long established, its relevance is sharpened by the current overcrowding and the pressure this puts on staff and management. If you put mainly vulnerable and probably unhappy and difficult people into crammed lock-ups and ask an overstretched staff to deal with them, then at all times you will need an independent and vigilant eye.
     Now, in a hair-brained decision that even out-trumps the Trump fiasco, the Scottish Government is set to abolish the visiting procedure and replace it with 'an independent advocacy system' and is clearly ruling out any significant monitoring role for the new organisation. All visits will be announced. The justice minister claims that the prisons are made otherwise adequately accountable. This is blatant nonsense. Visits by the HM inspector of prisons are infrequent. The Prison Complaints Commission was abolished last year. All other actors are a part of the system. 

 

In terms of finance alone a fraction of the money that will now be spent on advocacy contracts and their associated transaction costs could transform the training opportunities for the members of prison visiting committees.


     The decision has been taken in the face of the responses to the consultation and it is notable that not one woman prisoner was involved in the consultation's focus groups. The government promised to come up with a set of proposals at this time, following the consultation period, but it has instead made its decision and conveyed it in a 'Thank-You-And-Goodbye' letter to visitors, slipping the announcement into the pre-Christmas void.
     It is an open secret that the performance of visiting committees varies across the land and there is in particular an unhappy and shameful tradition of local councillors taking part in order to beef-up their committee profile and then doing little or nothing. Some local authorities need to be taking their visiting responsibilities much more seriously. But we don't abolish the police service just because some officers are lazy or corrupt, or schools because some teachers are incompetent. In terms of finance alone a fraction of the money that will now be spent on advocacy contracts and their associated transaction costs could transform the training opportunities for the members of prison visiting committees.
     What is leading the government down this disastrous path? The justice minister's fixation with 1980s-style streamlining is one thing. There is no indication that any inclusive cost accounting has gone into the decision. The strong lobbying position of the Scottish Prison Service is another. In the consultation their negative 1% outweighed the other 99% positive responses.  Overall, the government doesn't seem to have a scoobie about what is happening on the ground. They look set to put back progress towards the humane and just treatment of prisoners by about 100 years. But, hey, there are few votes in prison reform.
 

David Mackenzie was a secondary school teacher, education adviser and an education officer before taking a full part in the Trident Ploughshares campaign. He is currently active in the Forth Valley area on nuclear disarmament and on extending allotment provision for local people